CLC-222 Contracting Officers Representative (COR) Practice Exam 2025 - Free COR Practice Questions and Study Guide

In the context of bilateral modifications, these actions typically involve changes that require the agreement of both parties—the government and the contractor—usually because they affect the terms of the contract in a way that necessitates mutual consent.

When considering the reasons for executing a bilateral modification, actions such as adjusting the contract price, changing specifications, or extending the performance period often arise from negotiations or agreement on aspects that benefit both parties or require coordination due to unforeseeable circumstances.

Conversely, shortening the delivery schedule is more likely to be administratively modified unilaterally by the contracting officer to meet immediate needs or adjustments, as this tends to impose a change that affects one side more than the other without the same level of negotiation. It can often be viewed as a directive rather than a mutually agreed-upon change, making this option less likely to result in a bilateral modification. Thus, it typically does not require both parties to agree, indicating the nature of a unilateral modification rather than a bilateral one.